In other words, without indexing permissions, Otto has no way to fully utilize the data in the Void Treasures.
This is obviously inconsistent with what many people regard as the official setting: [Otto cleverly controls the degree of technological development, suppresses civilization by suppressing technology, and thus suppresses the intensity of Honkai.]
In fact, this sentence is pure bullshit.
In addition to the Sword Breaking Record setting I mentioned above, which clearly shows that the information Otto obtained is limited, there is another setting that is more important.
This is the setting of the Moon Shadow chapter that I have mentioned several times in this book.
In the setting of the Moon Shadow chapter, it is clearly stated that [in order to achieve this goal (referring to resurrecting Kallen), Destiny cannot destroy Honkai and must allow Honkai to develop].
Of course, after I mentioned this setting, I could see someone vindicating Otto in the interstitial posts [Is there a conflict between Otto allowing Honkai and Otto suppressing Honkai?].
I have found the pictures of the official settings, but some people still say things that are completely contradictory to the settings in order to excuse Otto.
Simba, Simba.
This setting is followed by another sentence, [But at the same time, one's technology must always be maintained at a level that can suppress the Honkai, so as to avoid being destroyed by the Honkai].
It is estimated that Otto's so-called suppression of civilization and technology in order to suppress the collapse should have evolved from this setting.
But is this what was meant?
First, let’s take a look at this passage.
What is Otto's purpose - to revive Kallen.
What was done to revive Kallen Otto - allowing the Honkai to develop while maintaining technology at a level that could kill it.
The so-called [always maintain one's own technology at a level that can suppress the Honkai] was passed on and became [Otto suppresses the Honkai].
Then, the story spread that Otto the Great successfully suppressed the strength of civilization and thus suppressed the collapse by developing high-end technology through clever means to suppress ordinary technology.
That's fucking outrageous.
Is it possible that Otto basically didn't care about the level of technology in the outside world, and the technology he got internally was also limited?
Some people probably didn't know that Otto didn't get the indexing authority from the Void Ten Thousand Storehouse, and thought that Otto already had all the information about the Void Ten Thousand Storehouse, so he could improve the technological strength bit by bit...
——Bullshit, it’s not like he can be so relaxed.
People who have this idea firstly haven't read the setting, and secondly don't understand Otto.
Otto wanted to resurrect Kallen before he came up with a new plan. Even between 2014 and 2015, Otto still had expectations for the Herrscher of Death.
If he had the ability, he would definitely want to allow the Honkai to develop to the point where he would have more chances to revive Kallen sooner, rather than dragging it out for five hundred years as some people thought was necessary.
Back to the previous topic, from the way this setting has been distorted after being circulated several times, it is enough to show how outrageous Otto is in the eyes of some people.
In the eyes of that group of people, Otto is a genius who never makes mistakes, a strategist who plans and calculates everything, a master of language art who never lies and only uses the truth to mislead others, a guardian of civilization who has suppressed the Collapse for five hundred years, a good boss who is ridiculously good to his subordinates and has more merits than faults, and a super Otto who can lead the trash of the previous civilization (in their eyes, the main characters of the previous civilization are pretty trash) to kill people indiscriminately.
Of course, these are the final combined Otto, which does not mean that every person of this type will agree with all of Otto's positioning.
But since I have offended Otto's fans today, I think it's no big deal to continue offending them.
This is how they see Otto, and even many authors write this way when they create secondary works [in fact, I can’t say that there is no trace of these remarks in my own book].
But the problem is - this ridiculously distorted second creation Otto and the original Otto are completely different species.
When I recreated this book, there were quite a few mistakes in the secondary settings, but overall it is still relatively close to the original.
I can't just write according to the original work and say that I am [Black] Otto, right?
Please refer to the above sentence for the reason why the opening remarks are two thousand words long.
...
(III) Main text
By the end of the Honkai chapter, Otto had survived in the book for approximately 158 million words. It can be said that he was the final BOSS of the book [Cocoon was more of a background enemy who was mentioned at the end].
What on earth have I done to be accused of always being a scoundrel of Otto?
First of all, he did bad things, which were actually quite gentle compared to what he did in the original novel.
When I say he is very gentle here, I don’t mean that Otto is very gentle. It’s because after he was forced into a desperate situation by Lin Yu, he had no cards to play and therefore could not cause more serious damage.
Secondly, dissatisfaction with Otto was expressed through main characters such as Lin Yu.
Some people think that I am padding the word count, expressing my own opinions, judging everything from a high position, and slandering the hero Otto (there are many readers who think the first two types, and there are also some who think the latter two).
The issue of word count depends entirely on readers' feedback. If readers think that the word count is water, no matter how much the author argues, it's meaningless. If everyone thinks that my word count is water, then I admit it and that's fine.
There is no need to say anything about this, it is indeed some personal opinion - but which book can say that it has no personal opinion at all?
Even when I am writing fan fiction, I will inadvertently express my own thoughts. This kind of personal opinion is something that is difficult to avoid when creating something.
The last two are pure bullshit.
Why I say that.
Although what I said above were all aimed at criticizing Otto, in fact, my evaluation of Otto and Otto's evaluation of himself are highly consistent.
Otto is very clear about who he is, and clearly emphasized what kind of evil he is in the Twilight of Fools.
Some people want to say that Otto's evil deeds only started in modern times, completely ignoring the words mentioned by Otto when he was narrating himself in the plot.
"In order to make up for the unspeakable trauma in my heart, I betrayed all my comrades over the long five hundred years."
This evaluation is also the writing tone of the image of Rialto in this book.
He was a traitor from the beginning. I have listed all his so-called merits one by one.
A traitor, a stinky dog, deserves the fate that a person who betrayed all of humanity should get. This was the plot that was destined from the beginning.
Something about Otto dying peacefully after watching Kallen's plan to resurrect him succeed - I would never write this kind of plot before and I will never write it in the future.
From a rational point of view, after the protagonist arrived, he watched Otto carry out his plan step by step, and finally let Otto's plan almost succeed?
Don't forget that Otto's plan is divided into two. Changguang clearly stated that one of them is to sacrifice all mankind, and the other is what Otto called the "plan with lower sacrifices". The plan with lower sacrifices has a 50% chance of being successfully executed.
Then change your thinking - the pseudo-god chapter created by Otto is a situation where ordinary people are exterminated.
As for those who think, "It would be nice to be able to go back five hundred years to prepare for the war," and "This would increase the probability of successfully saving the world."
If this theory is true, then are all the protagonists idiots or are they all evil creatures, stopping the great Lord Otto from carrying out his plan?
I think a normal protagonist with normal values would never allow Otto to continue doing evil if he has enough ability.
The above is a rational statement.
There aren’t so many fancy things about sentimentality—does the dog breed even match?
After harming people for five hundred years and causing so many serious problems, you still want to die peacefully after fulfilling your wish?
If I were to write this kind of plot, I would feel like I was trampling on the efforts of the heroes of destiny over the past five hundred years.
Well, back to the previous topic.
In the previous book, I tentatively considered the possibility of Otto surviving and teaming up with the protagonist, but I gave up the idea after only thirty seconds of thinking.
There was no such idea in this book from the beginning, the tone was that Otto must die.
Of course, until a short period after I started reading the book, my resentment...or hatred towards the character of Otto was not that strong.
There are many reasons why it turned out like this.
In terms of the plot structure, this book is divided into [Escape from the Sky], [Rebellion in the Nine Netherworlds], [Anti-Entropy Invasion], [Awakening of the Law of Death], [British Heritage], [Heavenly Lost Objects], [Awakening of Constraints], [Twilight of Fools], and [The End of the True Transformation].
The following chapters will discuss them one by one.
...
(1) [Escape from the Sky]
Before I finished writing the chapter "Escape from the Sky", I felt more and more that something was not right.
The current mainstream view is that most of the problems in the third collapse were caused by Kokolia, and a small part of the problems were caused by the Anti-Entropy trio's failure to stop Kokolia.
There is no problem up to this part. Although I have a good impression of Lao Yang and Dr. Red and Blue, it is indeed a manifestation of incompetence that they failed to stop Cocolia, causing Cocolia to cause the third Honkai Impact.
Before writing this book, my perspective was basically locked inside Anti-Entropy.
But I realized one thing while writing this book—what about Otto?
Oh, everyone thinks that Otto made a lot of money this time. It seems that he can get a lot of things just by watching Cocolia doing evil.
Ah, the problem was caused by Cocolia, a member of Anti-Entropy. What's wrong with Otto not stopping it?
This was indeed my opinion at the beginning, but after reviewing it, I found that it was not correct.
Holy shit, Tianming is an anti-Honkai Impact 3 organization, and someone created artificial Houkai Impact 3. Tianming, as an anti-Honkai Impact 3 organization, has eaten so much taxpayers' money, and recruited so many talents under the pretext of "fighting Houkai Impact 3". But when they knew someone was going to cause trouble, they just watched and watched and allowed the other party to cause trouble, which led to millions of people being killed by Cocolia. Is this justifiable?
Everyone is emphasizing that Otto benefited from this incident, but few people remember that as the archbishop/leader of the anti-Honkai organization, Sentence, Otto has the responsibility and obligation to take action to stop the other party when someone is about to cause Honkai.
Of course, because Otto is a beast, everyone is used to him being a beast, so even people who don't like Otto are used to Otto's mode. They just see that Otto has gained benefits, but fail to see that his failure to take action on the eve of the third collapse means that he has failed in his duty.
Those who praise Otto will certainly not deliberately emphasize Otto's shortcomings.
This caused both those who liked Otto and those who disliked Otto to completely forget one thing - as the Archbishop of Heaven's Mandate, if he encountered such a situation, even if he just sat there and did nothing, and let Cocolia take action, it would be a serious dereliction of duty.
Besides, I don't think anyone would think that [Otto didn't take any action, he just didn't have the chance to deal with Cocolia]. Even I, an Otto hater, think this is pure bullshit. If I write this, a group of people will think that I am criticizing Otto's intelligence and ability.
Judging from the fact that Ghost, the ace agent sent by Otto in the Moon Shadow chapter, had already been lurking near Cocolia, most of Cocolia's actions might have been carried out under Otto's nose.
After realizing this, my opinion of Otto further declined.
Back to the chapters in this book, Escape from the Sky is the most compact chapter.
As for why it's so compact, I moved a lot of people who didn't appear in the original work here, so isn't it compact with everyone moving forward?
Although Lin Yu, who did not regain his memory at the beginning, was affected by the hatred in his subconscious mind in some actions, overall he still acted for the sake of survival.
At this stage, Cocolia's evil deeds and Otto's indifference to Cocolia's evil deeds were one of the reasons why he worked so hard.
If Cocolia hadn't caused trouble, the third collapse would not have broken out so easily in Changkong City.
If Otto took the issues related to Honkai seriously and did what a leader of an anti-Honkai organization should do most, Cocolia's plan would never have a chance to proceed.
Why does Lin Yu hate these two people so deeply - nonsense, the evil deeds of the wicked son and the evil deeds of the eldest brother caused him to almost die outside, it would be strange if he could resist this hatred.
If you can't empathize, imagine that your boss starts to act up at work, causing you to almost lose your job and work so much overtime that you almost die. I think you should be able to have some similar emotions.
As for the Red, Blue and Yang trio who failed to manage their subordinates, how can the two types of people be compared, the heroes who risked their lives in the second collapse who did not do their best, and the two evil offspring who promoted the collapse/allowed it to develop?
If a hero has a flaw, you have to criticize him. If something is not done well, then I certainly have no objection if you want to criticize him.
But the same people who curse heroes at the same time praise bitches when they occasionally act gentle. What kind of logic is this?
Don't think I'm shooting in the air. You can all see how many people are cursing Anti-Entropy while praising Otto by using the achievements of all the members of Schicksal. There are a lot of such people not only in this book, but also in the comment section of Honkai Impact 3rd.
In the Escape from the Sky chapter of this book, Otto's movements that were not shown at all in the original work are strengthened [after all, the Escape from the Sky chapter was a plot from a long, long time ago. Otto handed the matter over to Theresa at the time. Theresa asked Himeko to drive the Hyperion to fight Lei Lu and said that she should trust Major Himeko. The main story is about a grandfather and grandson having brain cramps].
After Lin Yu launched the action, Otto, who had already sent Rita and Dai'e to ambush in Changkong City, intended to ensure the safety of K423, but he did not really try his best to stop Cocolia's actions.
While ensuring some of his abilities and character, it also strengthened Otto's early surface benefits.
Well, on the surface, at least on the surface, Otto's early profits were ridiculously high.
Somehow, he was almost able to complete the incomplete hand, and all that was missing were the bodies of the five Egyptian messengers.
As for my opinion on Otto, I was not as extreme as I am now. It was only after I brought in Lin Yu, the destined soldier, that I realized how disgusting it was to work under him.
Of course, up until this moment, my impression of Otto was not that bad.
...
(2) [Nine Hells Rebellion]
In the transitional plot of the Nine Nether Rebellion, I saw someone say that Otto suppressed Honkai, so I posted the setting I found in Chapter 73.
Then I saw how much nonsense some people can talk in order to whitewash Otto.
Before Chapter 73, although my opinion of Otto had dropped a lot, it had not reached the point it is today.
Oh, by the way, as an aside, when I first started playing Honkai Impact 3 or 4 years ago, I had some very stupid thoughts because some of the plots were unclear.
A typical example is the plot of [Raise the Sword of Rebellion to the Sky]. At that time, I felt that Himeko Theresa rushed too fast and did not make good arrangements for Saint Freya and the Far East Branch. The people in the branch followed you and suddenly became rebels. They were so miserable.
But later I realized what a stupid idea this was.
Jizi and Theresa rushed too fast, and not only should they not be criticized, but they should even be praised.
They were going against destiny, but the question is what was destiny doing at that time?
Otto took Kiana away and placed the Serenity Gem in Kiana's body. He even filled Kiana with Honkai energy in order to awaken Sirin.
Although Theresa seemed like an idiot who didn't know how dangerous the Herrscher was when escaping from the sky, her decision to rush to the Sky's Headquarters from the moment she raised the Sword of Rebellion to the sky to the last lesson was correct.
